[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Official sources vs. RCVS
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Official sources vs. RCVS |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:43:32 -0500 (EST) |
Derek R. Price writes:
>
> Okay, it applied and compiled fine, but I've already found a bug: if
> the executable can find the tag in val-tags, it won't provide an error
> when the specified tag doesn't exist in a file.
In what context? That's a fairly common response to a non-existent tag
that may not have anything to do with the patch.
-Larry Jones
Everything's gotta have rules, rules, rules! -- Calvin
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/29
- Re: Official sources vs. RCVS, Stephen Rasku, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, J. Cone, 2001/01/31
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/31
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/31