Re: forcing revision numbers

[Stephen Rasku]

Larry Jones write:
>
>Roman Fietze writes:
>>
>> >Synopsis:   forced check in in subdir hirarchies fail on local CVS 
root
>
>I've checked in a fix for this problem.  Thanks for the report, but
>note, please, that forcing specific revision numbers is a very bad 
idea
>-- you should treat the revision numbers as internal data for CVS and
>use tags instead.
>

If forcing revision numbers is a bad idea why don't we disable the 
functionality?  These questions seem to come up quite often here and 
info-cvs.  Why give people enough rope to hang themselves?

-- 
Stephen Rasku                   E-mail: stephen@tgivan.com
Senior Software Engineer        Web:    http://www.pop-star.net/
TGI Technologies