[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: forcing revision numbers
From: |
J. Cone |
Subject: |
Re: forcing revision numbers |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:58:37 +0100 |
Because being free to hang yourself is part of the Unix tradition.
So I can write a program that interprets the stamped-in tags in a program
to reconstruct its source.
Because you don't know what application someone will want to use it for, so
it's wrong to take away their opportunity.
At 07:56 10/07/01 -0700, Stephen Rasku wrote:
<snip>
>If forcing revision numbers is a bad idea why don't we disable the
>functionality? These questions seem to come up quite often here and
>info-cvs. Why give people enough rope to hang themselves?
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- RE: forcing revision numbers, Cameron, Steve, 2001/07/10
- RE: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10