RE: .origin patch

[Stephen Rasku]

Steve Cameron wrote:

>I wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>> Stephen Rasku wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > I am using the June 1st patch.
>> > 
>> > When I do "cvs log -rrel-2_3 <file>", I get the log entries 
1.1.2.1 
>> > and 1.1.2.2.  This is correct.
>> > 
>> > When I do "cvs log -rrel-2_3.origin <file>", I get log entry 
1.1.
>> > 
>> > Is the .origin patch supposed to work with "cvs log"?
>> > 
>> 
>> It's supposed to work. [...]
>
>Reading this again, isn't this the correct behavior?
>
>rel-2_3 is a branch with the branch tag pointing at revision 
1.1.0.2, right?
>that's the first branch off of revision 1.1.    So, the origin of 
this
>branch
>is 1.1, and, had you committed no changes to this file on this 
branch, and
>checked out this branch, you'd have gotten revision 1.1, right?
>
>So, I believe this is the correct behavior.
>
>Or did I miss something?

Yeah, that's right.  Please ignore the buffoon behind the curtain.

-- 
Stephen Rasku                   E-mail: stephen@tgivan.com
Senior Software Engineer        Web:    http://www.pop-star.net/
TGI Technologies