[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: spam spam spam
|
From: |
Art |
|
Subject: |
RE: spam spam spam |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:02:08 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bug-cvs-admin@gnu.org [mailto:bug-cvs-admin@gnu.org]On Behalf Of
> staffan.ohman@kolumbus.fi
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:22 AM
...
> > > > So what did we decide to do ?
> > > >
> > > > I can't stand it any longer.
> > Same here, I'd really like to at least read this list for a
> while, but the
> > SPAM ratio is horrible :(
> > Wouldn't allowing only subscribers to post suppress most if not
> all of it?
>
> I second that. Limit posting to subscribers only please !
Who assumes responsibility for the list administration?
Who makes the policy decisions?
Is there a standing policy for this list management?
The only somewhat positive response I heard on this was an
offer to host the list with limited administration, but it sounded
like SPAM would be reduced.
Note - I've reviewed a lot of the headers of incoming SPAM and
noticed a bunch "request@<maillists>" addressees! I.e., some of the
SPAMmers are actually subscribers!
Whoever adopts the list SHOULD a) only allow subscriber posts and
b) ignore all messages tagged by orbz.org as coming in from any
"black-holed" or "open relay" servers. c) filter out all incoming
messages through a local SPAM filter and run all remaining messages
through orbz.org.
Art