Re: PAM authentication patch - v2

[Larry Jones]

Derek Robert Price writes:
> 
> Speaking of committing, if I read the discussion correctly and noone 
> changed their mind without saying so, we're still at +1 developer votes:

I'm fence sitting.  As I see more and more problems with
incompatibilities between various PAM implementations, I'm becomming
more and more sympathetic to Greg's attitude that we shouldn't be in the
authorization business at all.  If you want PAM, use ssh (or rsh if you
must), not pserver.

-Larry Jones

I've changed my mind, Hobbes.  People are scum. -- Calvin