[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch)
|
From: |
Larry Jones |
|
Subject: |
Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2003 11:34:14 -0400 (EDT) |
Derek Robert Price writes:
>
> I guess I'm just looking at this as pretty much useless, or unused
> anyhow, by the majority and anethema to people like our bug reporter and
> why not remove it?
I was just reporting why it's there, I agree with your analysis and
conclusion.
-Larry Jones
I've never seen a sled catch fire before. -- Hobbes
- Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Rob Lanphier, 2003/05/09
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Larry Jones, 2003/05/09
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Rob Lanphier, 2003/05/09
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Larry Jones, 2003/05/09
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Brian Lenihan, 2003/05/10
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Derek Robert Price, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Larry Jones, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Derek Robert Price, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch),
Larry Jones <=
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Derek Robert Price, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Duncan Howard, 2003/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Paul Edwards, 2003/05/29
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Derek Robert Price, 2003/05/30
- Message not available
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch), Paul Edwards, 2003/05/30