[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:32:29 -0400 (EDT) |
Derek Price writes:
>
> Something like both clients would query the lock directory's existence
> and if they had cached that it didn't exist, both would return a
> successful status code to a program before they get the failure response
> from the NFS server.
As far as I remember, we don't query the lock directory's existence, we
just try to create it and see whether it fails or not. Since directory
creation is supposed to be atomic, even under NFS, I would argue that
any NFS implementation that returns based on a cache rather than waiting
for the server response is just plain broken.
-Larry Jones
Nobody knows how to pamper like a Mom. -- Calvin
- Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Oproescu Bogdan (KTXA 3), 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Mark D. Baushke, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Mark D. Baushke, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Larry Jones, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/12
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Larry Jones, 2005/08/11