[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:52:16 -0400 (EDT) |
Derek Price writes [quoting me]:
> >Since directory
> >creation is supposed to be atomic, even under NFS, I would argue that
> >any NFS implementation that returns based on a cache rather than waiting
> >for the server response is just plain broken.
>
> Possibly, but as far as I know it is a common problem. Don't know why.
"Common" as in "occurs with lots of different implementations" or
"common" as in "occurs with lots of different machines, all of which are
running some variant of Linux"? If it were the former, I'd have
expected to have run into it long ago.
-Larry Jones
Shut up and go get me some antiseptic. -- Calvin
- Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Oproescu Bogdan (KTXA 3), 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Mark D. Baushke, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Mark D. Baushke, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Larry Jones, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/11
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Derek Price, 2005/08/12
- Re: Clarifications: CVS Import Bug - Please Respond, Larry Jones, 2005/08/11