Re: merging the same version again and again and again and again and ...

[Harald Dunkel]

Hi Jim,

Jim Hyslop wrote:
> 
> CVS assumes nothing. You *told* it to merge the same file again and
> again. You may only omit the second -j option on the first merge. The
> second and subsequent merges must provide both -j options.
> 
Sorry, I missed to mention that I have this problem only for a
few files. All files in my directory had been merged between
2 branches (!= HEAD) several times. Most files are silently
skipped on the second merge. Only a few files became "dirty"
somehow.

> By the way, the better list for this type of question is
> info-cvs@nongnu.org.
> 

Sorry, I did not knew this mailing list. But isn't this
unpredictable behavior a bug, anyway?


Regards

Harri