Re: Is CVS development still active ?

[Mark D. Baushke]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com> writes:

> Is CVS development still active ?

Yes.

> Will we ever see 1.12 make it to stable ?

Yes. See URL:
  https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=4686
for the list of dependencies.

> What does it take to get a patch included in the three. 

s/three./tree?/

Test cases and general agreement that the patch is needed.

> I hit a problem with PAM/ldap on Solaris, and ended using this patch
> to solve it:
> 
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=4488

Yup. I believe Brian Murphy took care of that on 2005-10-16 in the
FEATURE branch which was almost two weeks after 1.12.13 was released.

Brian? If you applied #4488 to the FEATURE branch, could you please
close the bug?

> But I was wondering the chances of it to make it to the trunk, and the
> likely timeline.

I believe it is already present... (at least the part that made sense).
I am not sure if the 'pam_set_item (pamh, PAM_RUSER, pam_username);' code
was used or not.

You may checkout your own copy of the cvs 1.12.13.1 top-of-tree sources
Check out the 'CVS' link on the https://savannah.nongnu.org/cvs/?group=cvs
page.

        Enjoy!
        -- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEZBxECg7APGsDnFERAqiXAJ4scHHMXRBCmBzXBAnmXS3ZYSesXACglS0q
Wkmqb2nNmmGw5bmPC/QteW0=
=kLyB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----