bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Advice for Interix and to specify users


From: Jerker Bäck
Subject: RE: Advice for Interix and to specify users
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:08:45 +0200

Alright, I found the bug.
The test fails when it tries to open the directory for the actual file (I
think).

/tmp/cvs-sanity/cvsrootdir/123456789012345678901234567890/123456789012345678
901234567890/123456789012345678901234567890/123456789012345678901234567890/1
23456789012345678901234567890/123456789012345678901234567890/123456789012345
678901234567890/123456789012345678901234567890/12345678901234567890123456789
0/123456789012345678901234567890/file1,v

rcs.c (2055)
*pfp = CVS_FOPEN (rcs->path, FOPEN_BINARY_READ);
*pfp is NULL and errno is set to ENOENT (no such file or dir).

rcs->path contains the directory path only. Is that as intended?

fopen is right, there is no such directory visible. However, the symlink
"/tmp/cvs-sanity/cvsrootdir/second-dir/fileX,v" works and the real file (as
above) exists.

Hm ... I agree, sounds strange but that's how it is. I've seen this
behaviour before created by cvs (but even ftp and some other unix utilities)
both in Interix and CygWin. It is just not possible navigate to this
directory. We managed to create a file system error somehow. Actually, I
would say quite serious bug no matter whose fault it is.

Do CygWin pass the tests?

One possible reason could be that cvs ultimately are using ASCII/ANSI
versions of the system API file I/O functions. Since Windows NT is UNICODE
based, these functions are limited in e.g. buffer sizes. For complicated
things the real functions are a much better choice, but of course completely
unportable.

I need help. Where, when and how is this directory created?







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]