[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in util-linux 2.11n-4mdk sln executable missing
|
From: |
Gwenole Beauchesne |
|
Subject: |
Re: bug in util-linux 2.11n-4mdk sln executable missing |
|
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:54:26 +0200 (CEST) |
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> the question is : do we ensure rh compatibility (well i don't think
> there's much people requiring glibc for /sbin/sln :-)) or not ?
Explain "rh compatibility".
> we did put sln in glibc in the old days but chmouel removed it.
Chmouel removed it because it was supposedly useless. I can add it back
now that users find use to it. ;-)
Bye,
Gwenole