[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du)
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:18:14 +0100 |
Here we go. again.
You wanted it included, not me. I'm just telling you what you should
do to make Jim happy. =)
Some more nitpicks, I don't think this option deserves an short
option. And maybe you could make the long option take an argument?
I.e. something like --broader-size=12, this way you won't hit a
"limit", and you give the user freedom to pick her own preference.
Also, the option name sucks, it should be something more descriptive,
maybe --size-width?
One more thing, the man pages get generated from the --help output,
you should document this option in the .texi manual that is located
somewhere in the source tree.
And finally, I hate base64 encoded patches, but that is just me. If
one inlines them then one can easily comment on details or whatever,
this is impossible with base64 encoded patches.
Cheers.
- Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/15
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du),
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/16