Re: ls strange sort behavior...

[jonathan j kapleau cis stnt]

David,

Sorry about that.  Here is the result from running locale on my machine:

LANG=en_US.iso885915
LC_CTYPE="en_US.iso885915"
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.iso885915"
LC_TIME="en_US.iso885915"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.iso885915"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.iso885915"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.iso885915"
LC_PAPER="en_US.iso885915"
LC_NAME="en_US.iso885915"
LC_ADDRESS="en_US.iso885915"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.iso885915"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.iso885915"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.iso885915"
LC_ALL=

Hope that helps.

Jonathan Kapleau
address@hidden

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, David T-G wrote:

> Jonathan --
>
> ...and then jonathan j kapleau cis stnt said...
> %
> % Sorry if you are already aware of this.  What follows is the result of:
> %
> %     ls --version
> %
> % and:
> %
> %     ls -l
> %
> % on a local directory.
>
> That output does look rather interesting, but you have failed to provide
> us with the output of
>
>   locale
>
> so that we can see how your machine *should* be sorting.  Without that,
> we can only assume that it is doing it right whether or not it appears
> so.
>
>
> Let us know :-)
>
> :-D
> --
> David T-G                      * There is too much animal courage in
> (play) address@hidden * society and not sufficient moral courage.
> (work) address@hidden  -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health"
> http://justpickone.org/davidtg/      Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
>
>