Re: Non free software in dired-x.el

[Dave Love]

>>>>> "CS" == Charles Sebold <csebold@ezl.com> writes:

 CS> Of course, Ghostscript and viewers that use gs are quite good these
 CS> days, too, although not quite up to the level of the PDF-specific
 CS> viewers.

Probably not a big deal, but in my experience it produces better
results.  xpdf often produces bad-looking output for me (particularly
poor letter-spacing), apparently due to synthesizing or substituting
fonts poorly in some cases; I've never tried to figure out why.