[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string
From: |
Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: |
Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:47:33 -0700 |
Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> That's because all these primitives call expand-file-name internally,
> and expand-file-name returns the buffer's default directory when
> passed an empty string as an argument.
>
> I don't know off the top of my head why does expand-file-name do that.
>
> Do you have something better to suggest?
Do file systems actually allow an empty/null file name? If not, how about
signalling an error?
--
Kevin Rodgers <kevinr@ihs.com>
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, (continued)
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, David Kastrup, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, David Kastrup, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, David Kastrup, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/27
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, David Kastrup, 2002/02/27
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string,
Kevin Rodgers <=
- Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/27
Re: file-readable-p returns t for empty string, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/26