[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: view-read-only causes read-write
From: |
Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: |
Re: view-read-only causes read-write |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:10:29 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020406 Netscape6/6.2.2 |
Dan Jacobson wrote:
I did
$ emacs --no-site-file -q -nw -eval '
(and(setq view-read-only t) (describe-variable (quote
view-read-only)))'
Notes:
1. Ok, the help buffer says View mode in the modeline, but how about
turning on the -%%- marker in the modeline?
Setting that variable is not the right way to turn on View mode. Setting
any variable is never the right the right way to turn on a mode. Use the
mode's function.
2. Hey, real view-mode doesn't let me eat text with C-k etc, and then
you can't repair the damage with undo because no undo record is
kept for that buffer.
If you want the buffer in View mode, run the view-mode function.
3. OK, trying again without messing first with view-read-only
gives what one expects.
Do I smell someone toggling read-only once too much?
No. You don't understand that the variable is read to indicate to the user
that view mode is on, and that the view-mode function is used to invoke the
mode.
4. view-read-only's docstring: "*Non-nil means buffers visiting files
read-only, do it in view mode." (P.S. I assume the "*" means
"Chef's choice".)
OK, but what about read-only buffers not visiting files? Obviously
you are over affecting those and at the same time not mentioning them.
M-x pick-nit
P.S. I am no lisp pro but above I had to use an "(and ...)" or else
only one sexp was used, without any warning to the user.
Of course. Symbolic expressions are well-defined: (function arg ...).
In order to evaluate multiple sexps in sequence, use (progn ...) or multiple
--eval command line options.
PSS, while we are here, let's examine this docstring:
toggle-read-only is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `files'.
(toggle-read-only &optional ARG)
Change whether this buffer is visiting its file read-only.
With arg, set read-only iff arg is positive.
Ok, but it doesn't say what will happen if you give it a non positive
arg. One can't just assume "common sense". E.g. me, any common sense
and I wouldn't be hanging around this pop stand.
"iff" means "if and only if", which is a well-defined logical operator. It
means that if arg is not positive, unset read-only.
If visiting file read-only and `view-read-only' is non-nil, enter view mode.
Hold on a second. We came here to toggle-read-only and like wham, we
are sent into view mode. It's like I do "chmod -w file" and wham, "more
file" is invoked as a free bonus. What if I am a batch job? Anyway,
docsting looks bad. Didn't check the code.
Then do (setq read-only t) instead of (toggle-read-only 1) to avoid the side
effects.
--
<a href="mailto:<kevin.rodgers@ihs.com>">Kevin Rodgers</a>