[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:50:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
() Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:20:41 -0400
Joe Wells wrote:
> Has anyone else been able to reproduce this bug?
Yes, but I doubt that I can do anything about it,
except note that it exists.
i responded in another thread but perhaps it got dropped.
gist: there is a new variable gc-cons-percentage. perhaps
frobbing it (and other gc-foo vars) one can re-instate the gc
behavior of previous emacsen. thus: i don't think this is a bug.
thi
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/09/01
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/09/01
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Joe Wells, 2007/09/25
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Glenn Morris, 2007/09/27
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/27
- Message not available
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/28
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Joe Wells, 2007/09/28
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/28
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Joe Wells, 2007/09/28
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/28
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Joe Wells, 2007/09/28
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/29
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Joe Wells, 2007/09/29
- Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/29