[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:30:47 -0800 |
> > You could still argue that there ought to be some sort of
> > wrapper for the Finder so that users are made aware that
> > they lack a dependency if
> > they don't have the .el files, but I digress already.
>
> Yes, you could report this as a bug to Debian: when using
> a functionality that requires the .el files (like jumping to
> the source
> file or using finder-commentary), catch the error and replace it with
> a message explaining that the user needs to install the
> emacs*-el package.
Maybe the byte-compiler should preserve the Commentary, since some runtime
code depends on it? ;-)
Half-kidding. There's also a large variation in the amount and quality of
Commentary doc. This feature is of only limited value.
- Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, era, 2008/02/25
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, martin rudalics, 2008/02/25
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, era eriksson, 2008/02/25
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, martin rudalics, 2008/02/25
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/25
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, era eriksson, 2008/02/26
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/26
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, era eriksson, 2008/02/27
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/27
- RE: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/27
- RE: Documentation for ido-mode is not very enlightening, Drew Adams, 2008/02/27