[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:21:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> subr.el has had a dolist definition since at least Emacs 21.x; ie 9 years.
>> Therefore this cannot be a major issue in practice.
> In my book it is still a bug, no matter how many years ago this bug were
> introduced:
> - To have two different implementations of same function.
> - To not be able to rely on uniform behavior.
You look at it the wrong way: the problem is not with dolist, it's that
you use `return' which is a special form that's not defined in standard
Elisp. After (require 'cl), `return' gets defined and things work as
you expect.
Stefan
- bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?, Jari Aalto, 2010/11/16
- bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/16
- bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?, jari, 2010/11/17
- bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?, Štěpán Němec, 2010/11/17
- bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?, martin rudalics, 2010/11/17
- bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/18
- bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return, Jari Aalto, 2010/11/18
- bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/21
- bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return, jari, 2010/11/21
- bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/21