bug#18215: 24.4.50; OSX 10.6.8; set-frame-size by pixelwise does not work following `make-fame`.

[Keith David Bershatsky]

Here are the other relevant settings that were used to give the 
`(window--dump-frame)` printouts mentioned in my previous e-mail.

    (setq-default left-fringe-width 10)
    
    (setq-default right-fringe-width 0)
    
    (menu-bar-mode -1)
    
    (tool-bar-mode -1)
    
    (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(vertical-scroll-bars . nil))

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

At Sat, 09 Aug 2014 19:14:10 +0200,
martin rudalics wrote:
> 
>  > The patch you provided did indeed fix the problem -- both examples 
> mentioned in the initial bug report now work with the patched build of Emacs 
> Trunk from August 8, 2014.
>  >
>  > I should mention that there is a slight difference between the June 1, 
> 2014 build and the patched build of August 8, 2014.  The difference is about 
> six (6) pixels in frame width.  With the June 1, 2014 build, I use 1894 to 
> exactly fill the screen that is 1920 pixels wide.  With the patched build of 
> August 8, 2014, I would now need to use 1900 to exactly fill that same screen 
> which is 1920 pixels wide.  `(frame-pixel-width)` returns 1920 with the 
> patched build following (set-frame-size (selected-frame) 1900 1054 t).
> 
> Can you please in _both_ builds (that from June and the present one)
> evaluate
> 
> (window--dump-frame)
> 
> and post the contents of the buffer *window-frame-dump* for both builds
> here.  And please keep the CC for 18215@debbugs.gnu.org.
> 
> Thanks, martin