[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18313: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#18313: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:50:30 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
>
> Backtrace:
> 01201baf
> 01201c20
> 010f4223
w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:8490
emacs_abort at w32fns.c:8522
terminate_due_to_signal at emacs.c:383
die at alloc.c:7044
unwind_create_frame at w32fns.c:4265
do_unwind_create_frame at w32fns.c:4280
unbind_to at eval.c:3301
unwind_to_catch at eval.c:1162
Fsignal at eval.c:1559
menu_item_eval_property_1 at keyboard.c:7582
internal_condition_case_1 at eval.c:1370
menu_item_eval_property at keyboard.c:7601
parse_menu_item at keyboard.c:7777
single_menu_item at menu.c:334
map_keymap_item at keymap.c:566
map_keymap_internal at keymap.c:605
map_keymap_canonical at keymap.c:670
single_keymap_panes at menu.c:300
parse_single_submenu at menu.c:563
set_frame_menubar at w32menu.c:368
initialize_frame_menubar at w32menu.c:523
w32_window at w32fns.c:4158
Fx_create_frame at w32fns.c:4592
Ffuncall at eval.c:2810
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:3044
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:3044
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:3044
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
eval_sub at eval.c:2152
Fprogn at eval.c:463
funcall_lambda at eval.c:3037
Ffuncall at eval.c:2871
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:3044
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:3044
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
Fapply at eval.c:2349
Ffuncall at eval.c:2791
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:2978
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:3044
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:2978
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:2978
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
Fapply at eval.c:2296
Ffuncall at eval.c:2791
exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:918
funcall_lambda at eval.c:2978
Ffuncall at eval.c:2859
The assertion violation is here:
#ifdef GLYPH_DEBUG
/* Check that reference counts are indeed correct. */
eassert (dpyinfo->reference_count == dpyinfo_refcount); <<<<<<<<
eassert ((dpyinfo->terminal->image_cache == NULL
&& image_cache_refcount == 0)
|| (dpyinfo->terminal->image_cache != NULL
&& dpyinfo->terminal->image_cache->refcount ==
image_cache_refcount));
#endif
I guess that condition is wrong when frames are created in recursive
edit.