[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g'
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g' |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:01:23 -0700 (PDT) |
> > For me (on Windows) it is 100% reproducible on all of the builds
> > I mentioned.
>
> I do see it, but only after evaluating that strange form. If I don't
> evaluate it, "C-h k" woks as expected.
Correct.
(That strange form is from my `custom-file', which is updated by Customize.
It corresponds to what `custom-set-variables' expects, AFAICT.)
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/25
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Nicolas Richard, 2014/08/26
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/26
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g',
Drew Adams <=
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Glenn Morris, 2014/08/27