[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:34:15 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo@gmail.com>, 18752@debbugs.gnu.org,
> fni-news@pirilampo.org
> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:25:15 -0400
>
> I still constantly get "variable optimized away" messages in GDB.
Nothing can be done about this, given the complexity of DWARF and
compiler/debugger bugs in implementing its dark corners.
The problem with debugging -O2 code is that you cannot trust
backtraces, and cannot set breakpoints and be sure they will break.
This doesn't happen with -Og.
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, (continued)
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Ken Brown, 2014/10/17
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Fabrice Niessen, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Dani Moncayo, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Dani Moncayo, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Ken Brown, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/18
- bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?,
Eli Zaretskii <=