[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua erro
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Oct 2023 11:59:18 +0200 |
7 okt. 2023 kl. 23.02 skrev Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com>:
> (1) How can I specify "this group cannot be '[C]'" in the regexp?
Disallow files starting with a left square bracket?
> (2) How can I test this scenario in 'compile-tests.el'?
We can help out.
> I made the relevant groups greedy, but I wonder what difference it
> makes.
Only use non-greedy operators if they make the regexp significantly easier to
express. Greedy should be the default.
Non-greedy operators are usually less efficient, and always raise eyebrows when
read: why is this non-greedy?
Writing ".*?\n", as you did, makes no sense at all since "." will match
anything except newline, and the result is identical to ".*\n" but less
readable and maybe slower.
>> We try to make rules work with Windows file names (or names containing
>> spaces, which are also somewhat common on Windows) where relevant and
>> practical. Your patterns don't; can you argue that it's not useful for
>> Lua or not possible to do so?
>
> Good catch! Fixed.
Maybe you should test it just in case. (You don't need a Windows machine to do
that but it adds authenticity).
> I would understand if we did that for some long-dead compilers but not
> for Lua.
Look, it's not a beauty contest. We'll do what we have to.
> We still detect the file path/name, which is useful.
The point is that it substantially increases the risks of false matches. Lua
needs to be a good neighbour and can't just think of its own needs over
anything else.
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, (continued)
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/06
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/06
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/06
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/06
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/06
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/07
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/07
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/08
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/08
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2023/10/07
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2023/10/12
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2023/10/12
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/10/12
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/08
- bug#60830: 30.0.50; The *Compilation* buffer does not recognize Lua errors, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2023/10/12