[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66532: 29.1; dired-guess-default command for tar.zst file fails
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#66532: 29.1; dired-guess-default command for tar.zst file fails |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:33:17 +0300 |
> From: Michael Eliachevitch <m.eliachevitch@posteo.de>
> Cc: 66532@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:41:52 +0000
>
>
>
> > Does the patch below fix this?
> >
> > diff --git a/lisp/dired-aux.el b/lisp/dired-aux.el
> > index fc3f6f4..458acad 100644
> > --- a/lisp/dired-aux.el
> > +++ b/lisp/dired-aux.el
> > @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ dired-guess-shell-alist-default
> > "unxz")
> >
> > ;; zstandard archives
> > - `(,(rx (or ".tar.zst" ".tzst") eos) "unzstd -c %i | tar -xf -")
> > + `(,(rx (or ".tar.zst" ".tzst") eos) "unzstd -c * | tar -xf -")
> > `(,(rx ".zst" eos) "unzstd --rm")
> >
> > '("\\.shar\\.Z\\'" "zcat * | unshar")
>
>
> Yes, this patch works for me for a single tar.zst archive.
>
> However, when I mark multiple tar.zst archives and then run the
> suggested shell command (with *) on all of them, only the first archive
> gets extracted.. I just opened the Emacs manual dired section and found
> the `?' is a placeholder for which the command gets executed separately
> for each marked file. So with
>
> unzstd -c ? | tar -xf -
>
> each marked archive gets successfully extracted. Here also formatted as a
> patch;
>
> diff --git a/lisp/dired-aux.el b/lisp/dired-aux.el
> index 2ff620065a5..e0bcae6b005 100644
> --- a/lisp/dired-aux.el
> +++ b/lisp/dired-aux.el
> @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ dired-guess-shell-alist-default
> "unxz")
>
> ;; zstandard archives
> - `(,(rx (or ".tar.zst" ".tzst") eos) "unzstd -c %i | tar -xf -")
> + `(,(rx (or ".tar.zst" ".tzst") eos) "unzstd -c ? | tar -xf -")
> `(,(rx ".zst" eos) "unzstd --rm")
>
> '("\\.shar\\.Z\\'" "zcat * | unshar")
>
> I am just wondering that I didn't find the questionmark placeholder in
> any of the other suggested commands for compressed tar files, not sure
> if they work fur multiple marked files, I didn't test that.
Thanks, I installed your variant on the emacs-29 branch, and I'm
therefore closing this bug.