[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as v
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Oct 2023 08:04:00 -0700 |
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> Currently feature/named-lambdas is mostly working, not fully working.
> Probably the most pressing of these deficiencies is that native compiled
> lambda functions don't yet get their defining symbol set.
>
> There have been substantial amendments compared with the master branch,
> and it has not been tested much by anybody but me.
>
> Assuming it can be brought to a fully working state, there would be an
> extra symbol in each function definition which would make Emacs
> marginally bigger.
Does it have any performance implications?
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/10/25
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Andrea Corallo, 2023/10/25
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/10/27
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/28
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/10/28
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/28
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/10/28
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/28
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/10/28
- bug#66750: Unhelpful text in C-h v for variables with a lambda form as value, Stefan Monnier, 2023/10/29