bug#67990: 30.0.50; tree-sitter: treesit-node-field-name-for-child seems to be broken after recent changes

[Yuan Fu]

> On Dec 23, 2023, at 6:37 AM, Denis Zubarev <dvzubarev@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
> libtree-sitter is compiled from sources (latest version) 
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. emacs -Q
> 2. M-x find-file /tmp/t.py
> 3. Paste there
> if (v is not None and #comment
>    v > 0):
>   pass
> 4. M-x python-ts-mode
> 5. M-x treesit-explore-mode
>    python
> 
> Parse tree:
> (module
> (if_statement if
>  (parenthesized_expression (
>   (boolean_operator
>    left: (comparison_operator (identifier) operators: is not operators: is 
> not operators: (none))
>    operator: and operator: (comment)
>    operator: (comparison_operator (identifier) operators: > operators: 
> (integer)))
>   ))
>  condition: :
>  condition:
>   (block
>    (pass_statement pass))))
> 
> 
> Parse tree from the playground:
> module [0, 0] - [4, 0]
>  if_statement [0, 0] - [2, 7]
>    condition: parenthesized_expression [0, 3] - [1, 10]
>      boolean_operator [0, 4] - [1, 9]
>        left: comparison_operator [0, 4] - [0, 17]
>          identifier [0, 4] - [0, 5]
>          none [0, 13] - [0, 17]
>        comment [0, 22] - [0, 30]
>        right: comparison_operator [1, 4] - [1, 9]
>          identifier [1, 4] - [1, 5]
>          integer [1, 8] - [1, 9]
>    consequence: block [2, 3] - [2, 7]
>      pass_statement [2, 3] - [2, 7]
> 
> 
> Version from the playground has correctly assigned fields:
> parenthesized_expression - condition:, block is labeled as
> consequence:, the second comparison_operator - right:
> 
> I noticed this regression after 9874561f39e62c1c9fada6c2e013f93d9ea65729.
> Quote from this commit "So turns out ts_node_field_name_for_child takes a 
> named node index,"
> It seems that was a bug in the libtree-sitter and they fixed it in
> https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/pull/2104
> Unfortunately, there is no release with this fix yet.
> 
> I have tested various combinations of libtree-sitter and fix from 9874561f39:
> With commit 9874561f39
> libtree-sitter v0.20.8 - condition: and consequence: fields are wrongly 
> assigned
> libtree-sitter version with the fix* - most fields are broken
> 
> When reverting commit 9874561f39
> libtree-sitter v0.20.8 - only right: field is wrong (points to the comment 
> node)
> libtree-sitter version with the fix* - ok
> 
> 
> * tree-sitter version with the fix:
> git clone https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter.git
> git checkout 6d1904c221d15d2fcbe0b590ff0a3f96c692429f
> It is needed to recompile grammar after changing the libtree-sitter version.

Thank you very much! So it seems that we should revert that commit, and point 
to libtree-sitter if people come to us reporting errors. I reverted that commit 
on emacs-29.

Yuan