[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:30:27 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 04:36:02PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> If we merge the improvements of, say, GPL memset.c into my LGPL
> memset.c, can we throw away the GPL file and distribute the merge
> under the LGPL? I don't want to stop people from upgrading to the
> next release of libtool just because some bits of infrastructure
> force me (and hence them) to change to GPL.
I think if you combine LGPL + GPL, GPL wins, as it is _more_
restrictive. I don't see how a license combination will allow the less
restrictive license to win (if that is the case, BSD + GPL => BSD).
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Jim Meyering, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Karl Berry, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Karl Berry, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Karl Berry, 2004/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/03/31
Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/31