[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-gnulib] Re: [Patch] mode_* when compiling findutils with fresh gnul
From: |
Bas van Gompel |
Subject: |
[bug-gnulib] Re: [Patch] mode_* when compiling findutils with fresh gnulib |
Date: |
Tue, 24 May 2005 03:49:56 +0200 (MET DST) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (Win32) Hamster/2.0.6.0 KorrNews/4.2 |
Op Mon, 23 May 2005 01:12:58 -0700 schreef Paul Eggert
in <address@hidden>:
: address@hidden (James Youngman) writes:
:
: > Gnulib guys, what's the significance of the changes made to
: > modechange.c? How should callers who previously used MODE_MASK_PLUS
: > modify their code to get the same behaviour?
:
: We couldn't find any programs that set some of the MODE_MASK bits but
: not others, and which also conformed to POSIX; so we removed that part
: of the interface. As far as I can see GNU find falls into the same
: camp (though admittedly the POSIX wording is a bit muddy here).
Excuse my ignorance, but I don't understand the above statement.
Could you elaborate a bit, please?
Is a functional change in findutils to be expected from this?
: Also, I notice that import-gnulib hasn't been updated to reflect
: the fact that config.rpath now lives in gnulib/build-aux.
That's another story, and might deserve another patch.
: So I propose this patch to findutils.
So, my patch apparently /was/ correct (except the (c)-year). :-/
[...]
L8r,
Buzz [who thought findutils was one of the main gnulib-dependents].
--
) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not
-- | | / / really is | and false bits entirely. | mail for
) | | / / a 72 by 4 +-------------------------------+ any1 but
-- \--| /--- /--- .sigfile. | |perl -pe "s.u(z)\1.as." | me. 4^re