Re: support for multithread-safe libraries

[James Youngman]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:34:51AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:

> How about if we use a name that is less likely to collide?  For
> example, we use "lok", and the file names lok.h, lok.c, and lok.m4.
> Or perhaps you can think of a better name.  ("gl-lock"? "gllock"? I
> like puns, so I'd go with "lawk".  :-)

How about "glock"?  Another thing to shoot yourself in the foot
with...

James.