Re: Opening a can of worms: a readline gnulib module?

[Stepan Kasal]

Hello,

On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:53:45AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> All of this is hypothetical though, since it doesn't look like adding
> the readline library as a gnulib module will happen now.

Why not?  I don't see any reason against the "readline stub" module
you proposed.

Bruno pointed out problems with "full readline" module, and asked:
> > rl_add_defun etc.). Do you want to provide all these symbols?

Your answer was no.

So with your module, the application would have:
1) readline() function
2) #if READLINE

I guess it might be worth it.  Opinions?

Have a nice day,
        Stepan