Re: nanosleep module and mingw32

[Simon Josefsson]

Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...
>> Wouldn't this be a good situation to have nanosleep depend on the
>> unistd module, and make the replacement unistd.h include winsock2.h on
>> mingw32 platforms?  After all, nanosleep.c include unistd.h, and
>> unistd.h define select on some platforms.
>
> Yes, I'd prefer that.  Did you (Simon) just volunteer?  :)

I'd prefer to test Paul's approach first.