Re: gplv3 files and updates

[Paul Eggert]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> The sequence of events that I'm hoping for is this:
>   - First, get agreement that all projects that use gnulib are OK with GPLv3.

I don't hear any objection, so let's assume there's agreement on that topic.

>   - Then, over a few weeks, let these projects upgrade their READMEs and
>     license notices in their source code.

OK, but I'd rather have this done sooner than later.  The longer we
wait the more hassles we'll have in terms of people asking us what's
going on.

How about if we set a changeover date for gnulib?  I propose July 10.
Normally I don't like deadlines but there's not that much harm if
developers don't make the deadline.

>   - Then, change the license notices in gnulib's code.

Yes.  We can do this on July 11.