bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: canonicalize-lgpl-tests on cygwin


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: canonicalize-lgpl-tests on cygwin
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:43:03 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Hi Eric,

You wrote on 2007-06-19:
> I'm applying this as obvious.  Findutils 4.3.8 fails to compile out of the
> box on cygwin without this, since the canonicalize-lgpl test is not linked
> against libintl.
> 
> 2007-06-19  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * modules/canonicalize-lgpl-tests (test_canonicalize_lgpl_LDADD):
>       Allow compilation on cygwin.
> 
> --- modules/canonicalize-lgpl-tests     6 Apr 2007 20:08:02 -0000       1.3
> +++ modules/canonicalize-lgpl-tests     19 Jun 2007 12:58:37 -0000
> @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ TESTS += test-canonicalize-lgpl.sh
>  TESTS_ENVIRONMENT += EXEEXT='@EXEEXT@'
>  check_PROGRAMS += test-canonicalize-lgpl
>  EXTRA_DIST += test-canonicalize-lgpl.sh
> -
> +test_canonicalize_lgpl_LDADD = $(LDADD) @LIBINTL@

But now this test fails on Linux platforms, see in Simon's build logs:
  http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/log-200707031437719807000.txt

I don't understand it: If test-canonicalize-lgpl depends - directly or
indirectly on the module 'gettext-h', then @LIBINTL@ will expand to something
(possibly empty) in the Makefile, then how can the error in Simon's logs
occur? And if it doesn't, then where did the error that you saw in findutils
on cygwin come from? ???

Bruno





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]