[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xstrtol.h
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: xstrtol.h |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:01:14 +0200 |
Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> Here's the xstrtol.h change, then the ones for coreutils:
The ones for coreutils are incomplete.
I'll repost with a better set, once I've tested properly.
- Re: POTFILES.in updates?, (continued)
- Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/19
- Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/19
- Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Eric Blake, 2007/07/19
- Re: xstrtol.h (was: Re: POTFILES.in updates?), Bruno Haible, 2007/07/21
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/21
- Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Eric Blake, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Ben Pfaff, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/25
- human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/26
- Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/26
- Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/26
Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Eric Blake, 2007/07/19
Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Karl Berry, 2007/07/23