[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4]
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4] |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:14:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> I think it is worth applying, after addressing any nits.
Applied, with the change that you mentioned:
> > + stream->_flags &= ~__SOPT;
> > + stream->_flags |= __SNPT;
>
> Is it more efficient to write it like this?
> stream->_flags = (stream->_flags & ~__SOPT) | __SNPT;
gcc generates identical code for both. But why not?
Bruno
- Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4], (continued)
Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4], Joerg Sonnenberger, 2007/07/27
Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4], Eric Blake, 2007/07/31
Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4],
Bruno Haible <=
Message not available
Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4], Bruno Haible, 2007/07/30
Re: address@hidden: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/m4], ebb9, 2007/07/26