Re: definition of NULL

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hello,

* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:26PM CEST:
> Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> writes:
> > The definition of NULL is a particularly thorny area, because so many 
> > headers
> > use it and so many headers define it. I don't think it's worth the trouble -
> 
> It wasn't _that_ much trouble.

Just to know whether the trouble was spent well: did you report a bug
with NetBSD?  Their fixing their headers would be nice, even with your
patch, and one would hope it wouldn't be a lot of trouble either.

Thanks,
Ralf