[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
popen bugs, popen_safer
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
popen bugs, popen_safer |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:14:49 -0700 (PDT) |
Even though Bruno's pipe module is generally a better
interface than popen, I discovered yet another popen
bug in cygwin today[1] (I fixed a cygwin popen bug in
August 2006, only to have it regress in December of
that year when cgf rewrote the implementation to be
faster). So even though m4 no longer uses popen, I'm
at least going to write a popen replacement module,
and wondering if I should also add popen_safer in the
process.
[1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-08/msg00582.html
--
Eric Blake
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/popen-bugs%2C-popen_safer-tp25015933p25015933.html
Sent from the Gnulib mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- popen bugs, popen_safer,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: popen bugs, popen_safer, Eric Blake, 2009/08/19
- O_CLOEXEC support (was: popen bugs, popen_safer), Eric Blake, 2009/08/19
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Eric Blake, 2009/08/20
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Eric Blake, 2009/08/21
- [PATCH] popen-safer: test O_CLOEXEC at run-time., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21