Re: O_CLOEXEC support

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 08/20/2009 10:18 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Why not just implement a fcntl replacement, supporting only
> > F_GETFD/F_SETFD for now (and maybe in the future F_DUPFD and
> > F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, as you mention below)?
>
> One thing at a time. I agree with Eric. I would have a hard time
> reviewing a patch that implements fcntl, popen, popen-safer, and
> fixes flock, all in one patch.

Oh, I agree that this shouldn't be part of the popen-safer patch (which 
has been already committed, anyway).

Paolo