[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pipe-filter self-tests
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: pipe-filter self-tests |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:48:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I'm undecided whether it's better to talk about dates, or rather say
> "2.6.27 to 2.6.29"
Why not both? Applied:
--- doc/posix-functions/dup2.texi.orig 2009-08-26 01:46:07.000000000 +0200
+++ doc/posix-functions/dup2.texi 2009-08-26 01:45:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
@item
This function may return @code{-EBADF} instead of @code{-1} on some platforms:
-Linux releases between July 2008 and May 2009.
+Linux releases between July 2008 and May 2009 (versions 2.6.27 to 2.6.29).
@item
This function is missing on some older platforms.
- Re: pipe-filter self-tests, (continued)
- Re: pipe-filter self-tests, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/20
- Re: Wine, qemu, emulators, Bruno Haible, 2009/08/21
- Re: Wine, qemu, emulators, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21
- Re: Wine, qemu, emulators, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/21
- Re: Wine, qemu, emulators, Bruno Haible, 2009/08/29
- Re: Wine, qemu, emulators, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/31
Re: pipe-filter self-tests, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/24
Re: pipe-filter self-tests, Simon Josefsson, 2009/08/25