[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+ |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:51:07 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> It may be time to ask rms if the FSF can do
> the relicensing, rather than our current policy of tracking down all
> contributors and asking them to use their grant-back clause of their FSF
> copyright assignment as our backdoor of not having to involve the FSF.
It wouldn't hurt to ask rms this once, but
I wouldn't want to bother him with minor requests
like this every time they comes up. We have
a general guideline that it's ok to relicense
gnulib libraryish code using the LGPL,
and all that's arguably needed is for rms
to review the guideline.
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/09/09
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Eric Blake, 2013/09/12
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Simon Josefsson, 2013/09/12
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+,
Paul Eggert <=
- Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Karl Berry, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Karl Berry, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/09/23
- Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/23