Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft

bug-gnulib

From:	Karl Berry
Subject:	Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft
Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:52:33 -0600

The difference lies in *non*-glibc functionality offered by gnulib.
Of which there is also plenty, afaik.

k

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/09/09
- Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Eric Blake, 2013/09/12
  - Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Simon Josefsson, 2013/09/12
  - Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/12
    - Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Eric Blake, 2013/09/12
    - Re: Request to relicense hash gnulib module to LGPLv2+, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/12
    - Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/19
    - Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
    - Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Karl Berry, 2013/09/19
    - Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
    - Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Karl Berry <=
    - Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Paul Eggert, 2013/09/19
    - Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/09/23
    - Re: Relicensing policy & weak copyleft, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/23