[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'static' in array-size func parm
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: 'static' in array-size func parm |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Aug 2014 05:09:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
() Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:54:14 -0700
Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> IIUC, as it is proposed, RCS would still have to do that test
> and then re-‘#define VLA_ELEMS’:
No, because if RCS uses Gnulib's vararrays module, the test will be
done correctly, and will catch the Solaris 10 bug.
Cool. I see that now, looking at m4/vararrays.m4.
Actually, all that RCS should have to do is use the vla module; this
module should bring in vararrays automatically. I assume it's using
gnulib-tool?
Yes. In this case, i eagerly await gnulib module ‘vla’ and will switch
RCS to use it (and ‘VLA_ELEMS’).
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
(if you're human and you know it)
read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
(not (via 'mailing-list)))
=> nil
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- 'static' in array-size func parm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/06
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/06
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/06
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/06
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/06
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/07
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/08
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/08
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/08
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/08
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/09
- Re: 'static' in array-size func parm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/09