Re: [PATCH] stddef: support C11's max_align_t

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> I thought about that, but my kneejerk reaction was that the likelihood that a 
> new architecture would come in without C11 support was low enough (and 
> declining) that it didn't seem worth the trouble of adding a dependency on 
> the 
> longlong module.

OK.

> But perhaps I'm underestimating how long Microsoft will take -- is that the 
> main 
> worry here?

I was more worrying about architectures that are different from all we know
so far. But you're right: They will most likely provide the C11 support
themselves, by then.

Bruno