bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug in do-release-commit-and-tag


From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: bug in do-release-commit-and-tag
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:26:52 +0100

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm considering the use of do-release-commit-and-tag for releasing m4
> 1.4.18, but I tested it while in the middle of a git rebase, and got:
>
> $ ./build-aux/do-release-commit-and-tag 1.4.18 stable
> ./build-aux/do-release-commit-and-tag: line 146: test: too many arguments
> do-release-commit-and-tag: not on branch (no branch, rebasing branch-1.4)
>
>
> The following is a rough patch that would avoid the improper use of
> test, but it still leaves a wonky error message.  I'm not sure if a
> better fix would be a change to the computation of the default value of
> $branch earlier in the file.  I guess that means I'm not even sure of
> the best way to use the script.
>
> Suggestions?
>
>
> diff --git i/build-aux/do-release-commit-and-tag
> w/build-aux/do-release-commit-and-tag
> index b4f3251..02e5f52 100755
> --- i/build-aux/do-release-commit-and-tag
> +++ w/build-aux/do-release-commit-and-tag
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  # controlled .prev-version file, automate the procedure by which we record
>  # the date, release-type and version string in the NEWS file.  That commit
>  # will serve to identify the release, so apply a signed tag to it as well.
> -VERSION=2016-01-12.23 # UTC
> +VERSION=2016-12-31.14 # UTC
>
>  # Note: this is a bash script (could be zsh or dash)
>
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ esac
>
>  # Ensure the current branch name is correct:
>  curr_br=$(git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name HEAD)
> -test "$curr_br" = refs/heads/$branch || die not on branch $branch
> +test "$curr_br" = "refs/heads/$branch" || die not on branch $branch
>
>  # Extract package name from Makefile.
>  Makefile=$builddir/Makefile
>
> --
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>

Hi Eric,
That patch looks fine.
I use that script only via the instructions in a typical
README-release file, e.g., I ran commands like this for yesterday's
sed-4.3 release:

  make release-commit RELEASE='4.3 stable'
  make release RELEASE='4.3 stable'

It sounds like you're on the right track, adding gitlog-to-changelog support.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]