|
| From: | Paul Eggert |
| Subject: | Re: Suppressing sanitizer in sha256.c |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:03:43 -0700 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 04/03/2018 01:47 PM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
This is expected behavior but still it rings the 'alarm bell'.
My kneejerk reaction is that the code has well-defined behavior and I'd rather that developers didn't use -fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow. For Gnulib, that flag is more trouble than it's worth.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |