[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testing gnulib on riscv64 - replacement modules (update)
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Testing gnulib on riscv64 - replacement modules (update) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2018 10:50:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-119-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Rich,
> $ (cd gllib; ls -1 $(${GNULIB_CHECKOUT}/posix-modules | sed -e 's|-posix$||'
> | sort -u | grep -v 'nonblocking' | sed -e 's|$|.o|') 2>/dev/null )
> fclose.o
> fcntl.o
> fflush.o
> fseek.o
> fseeko.o
> ioctl.o
> math.o
> mbrlen.o
> mbrtowc.o
> nanosleep.o
> strerror_r.o
> sys_socket.o
> unistd.o
> wctype-h.o
>
> Full build log:
>
> http://oirase.annexia.org/tmp/build.log
>
> We're using glibc 2.27.9000-7.fc28.riscv64 from Fedora, and the latest
> gnulib from git.
>
> It looks like the glob.o bug has been fixed
Yes. And for the rest of the .o files, the explanations from my previous
analysis [1] hold.
> but there is still a lot of investigation to be done.
No, the other issues are known Linux or glibc problems that are not likely
to be fixed soon.
> BTW the real hardware has working floating point.
Yes, otherwise some floating-point modules would be appearing here or failing
their tests.
Bruno
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2018-03/msg00057.html