Re: relocatable.texi: improve reference to packaging systems?

[Reuben Thomas]

On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 16:40, Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> wrote:

Reuben Thomas wrote:
> If you still don't agree, then I suggest: "The package systems of most
> GNU/Linux distributions."

The same problem exists for distros on macOS (MacPorts, Fink, ...), Solaris
(OpenCSW), and so on.

Also, Wikipedia [1][2] uses the term "package management systems", so let's
use that's term.

Yes, I was wondering about the wording, but hadn't found a better! I agree, since it's almost(?) all of them, and most readers of this document will know what one is, might as well stay generic.

--

https://rrt.sc3d.org